Academic Journal

The emergence of a security discipline in the post 9-11 discourse of U.S. security organisations.

Bibliographic Details
Title: The emergence of a security discipline in the post 9-11 discourse of U.S. security organisations.
Authors: Hunter, Duncan1 (AUTHOR) d.hunter@hull.ac.uk, MacDonald, Malcolm N.2 (AUTHOR)
Source: Critical Discourse Studies. Apr2017, Vol. 14 Issue 2, p206-222. 17p.
Abstract: This paper explores two views of the changes that have occurred in the U.S. security services as a result of their post 9/11 reform. The first is Bigo’s suggestion that agencies worldwide have become enmeshed in shared activity so as to constitute a new ‘field of (in)security’. A second, novel perspective is that the security services have developed many of the characteristics of a discipline or ‘discursive formation’, constructing intelligence both as a form of expertly constituted knowledge and as the basis for a new type of professional, disciplinary power. The investigation combines corpus techniques with other discourse analysis procedures to examine a corpus of public-facing texts generated by the U.S. security agencies. The investigation aims to synthesise evidence consistent with both views of the security services’ recent historical change; that features of their discourse signal their emergence simultaneously as a new field and discursive formation. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]
Subject Terms: National security, September 11 Terrorist Attacks, 2001, Disciplinary power
Geographic Terms: United States
Company/Entity: United States. Federal Bureau of Investigation , United States. Central Intelligence Agency
Copyright of Critical Discourse Studies is the property of Routledge and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
ISSN: 17405904
DOI: 10.1080/17405904.2016.1268185
Database: Communication & Mass Media Complete
Full text is not displayed to guests.