Academic Journal
Interpretation, Argumentation, and the Determinacy of Law.
| Title: | Interpretation, Argumentation, and the Determinacy of Law. |
|---|---|
| Authors: | Sartor, Giovanni1,2 giovanni.sartor@eui.eu |
| Source: | Ratio Juris. Sep2023, Vol. 36 Issue 3, p214-241. 28p. |
| Abstract: | This article models legal interpretation through argumentation and provides a logical analysis of interpretive arguments, their conflicts, and the resulting indeterminacies. Interpretive arguments are modelled as defeasible inferences, which can be challenged and defeated by counterarguments and be reinstated through further arguments. It is shown what claims are possibly (defensibly) or necessarily (justifiably) supported by the arguments constructible from a given interpretive basis, i.e., a set of interpretive canons coupled with reasons for their application. It is finally established under what conditions such arguments provide single outcomes or rather support alternative interpretive conclusions, thus leading to propositions of law whose truth‐value is undetermined. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Subject Terms: | *INTERPRETATION (Philosophy), *DEBATE, *PHILOSOPHICAL analysis, *TELEOLOGY |
| Company/Entity: | EUROPEAN Research Council |
| ISSN: | 09521917 |
| DOI: | 10.1111/raju.12389 |
| Database: | Academic Search Index |
Availability