Academic Journal

Ethnicity or Policy? The Conditioning of Intergroup Trust in the Context of Ethnic Conflict.

Bibliographic Details
Title: Ethnicity or Policy? The Conditioning of Intergroup Trust in the Context of Ethnic Conflict.
Authors: Carlin, Ryan E.1 (AUTHOR) rcarlin@gsu.edu, González, Roberto2 (AUTHOR), Love, Gregory J.3 (AUTHOR), Miranda, Daniel Andres2 (AUTHOR), Navia, Patricio D.4 (AUTHOR)
Source: Political Psychology. Apr2022, Vol. 43 Issue 2, p201-220. 20p. 3 Charts, 4 Graphs.
Abstract: How do stances on public policies aimed at ethnic conflict resolution affect intergroup trust? Building on theories of prosociality, social identity, and intergroup bias, we expect redistributive policy preferences meant to resolve ethnic conflict to replace ethnicity as the main barrier to intergroup trust because their zero‐sum nature raises intergroup threat. We test our expectations in Chile's ongoing indigenous/nonindigenous conflict using behavioral trust games embedded in an online nationally representative quota survey (n = 1105). Results align with our expectation. Namely, a lack of shared ethnic identity between nonindigenous Chileans and indigenous Mapuche does not lower intergroup trust. However, shared stances on a policy that would raise taxes to spur development in indigenous communities do increase intergroup trust discrimination. We probe the psychological mechanism—meaningful policy‐based group identities—by testing whether trustor indigenous identification and trustor political ideology moderate the effect of trustee policy stances on intergroup trust. Results are consistent with our assumption that shared policy stances can, indeed, form the basis of a meaningful social identity. Hence the very policies meant to end intergroup conflict could potentially perpetuate or redirect it to institutional channels of representation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Subject Terms: *Government policy, Ethnic conflict, Ethnicity, Moderates (Political science), Group identity
Geographic Terms: Chile
Copyright of Political Psychology is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
ISSN: 0162895X
DOI: 10.1111/pops.12747
Database: Business Source Complete
Full text is not displayed to guests.