Academic Journal
Examining the Inter-Governmental Authority on Development's (IGAD) Non-Intervention Principle as a Conflict Management Strategy in the Horn of Africa.
| Title: | Examining the Inter-Governmental Authority on Development's (IGAD) Non-Intervention Principle as a Conflict Management Strategy in the Horn of Africa. |
|---|---|
| Authors: | Gebru, Micheale K.1,2 micheale.kihishen@aau.edu.et, Tronvoll, Kjetil3 |
| Source: | Negotiation & Conflict Management Research. 2024, Vol. 17 Issue 1, p41-71. 31p. |
| Abstract: | The Inter-Governmental Authority on Development (IGAD) advocates for non-intervention principle as a conflict management strategy in the Horn of Africa. However, the principle's contribution and effectiveness in conflict management have sparked debates and concerns. Thus, the purpose of this article is to critically examine the IGAD non-intervention principle in conflict management, focusing on its actual contributions and potential shortcomings. The principle is assessed based on its stated objectives and the attainment of the desired outcomes. The study used the principles of non-intervention and responsibility to protect to examine the IGAD's non-intervention. The study adopted qualitative research methodology with a case study design. Four interstate interventions were selected as case studies and used as data sources. The findings demonstrate that IGAD's non-intervention policy fails to prevent and manage interstate intervention and intrastate conflicts. The principle does not manage to protect the sovereignty of its member states, as the region witnessed four cases of interstate intervention between 2005 and 2020. The principle's inability to prevent and manage interstate interventions and intrastate conflicts demonstrates its limitations in achieving desired outcomes. The article has identified four limitations of the principle: lack of clarity on nonintervention and internal affairs, mismatch between rhetoric and state practice, IGAD's lack of enforcement mechanisms, and the principle's limitations in dealing with contemporary peace and security challenges in a region with high level of conflicts. This article further illustrates that the principle not only has limitations in managing conflicts but also contradicts its objectives, hindering the organization's leadership role. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Subject Terms: | *Conflict management, *Qualitative research, Research methodology, Experimental design |
| Geographic Terms: | Horn of Africa |
| Company/Entity: | Intergovernmental Authority on Development |
| Copyright of Negotiation & Conflict Management Research is the property of International Association for Conflict Management/Carnegie Mellon University Libraries Publishing and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) | |
| ISSN: | 17504708 |
| DOI: | 10.34891/hb2m-tf52 |
| Database: | Business Source Complete |
Availability