Academic Journal

Verbal Aggressions Against Major League Baseball Umpires Affect Their Decision Making.

Bibliographic Details
Title: Verbal Aggressions Against Major League Baseball Umpires Affect Their Decision Making.
Authors: Guérette, Joël1,2 (AUTHOR), Blais, Caroline1 (AUTHOR), Fiset, Daniel1 (AUTHOR) daniel.fiset@uqo.ca
Source: Psychological Science (0956-7976). Mar2024, Vol. 35 Issue 3, p288-303. 16p.
Abstract: Excessively criticizing a perceived unfair decision is considered to be common behavior among people seeking to restore fairness. However, the effectiveness of this strategy remains unclear. Using an ecological environment where excessive criticism is rampant—Major League Baseball—we assess the impact of verbal aggression on subsequent home-plate umpire decision making during the 2010 to 2019 seasons (N = 153,255 pitches). Results suggest a two-sided benefit of resorting to verbal abuse. After being excessively criticized, home-plate umpires (N = 110 adults, employed in the United States) were less likely to call strikes to batters from the complaining team and more prone to call strikes to batters on the opposing team. A series of additional analyses lead us to reject an alternative hypothesis, namely that umpires, after ejecting the aggressor, seek to compensate for the negative consequences brought on by the loss of a teammate. Rather, our findings support the hypothesis that, under certain conditions, verbal aggression may offer an advantage to complainants. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Subject Terms: *Decision making, Baseball umpires, Invective, Adults, Batting (Baseball)
Company/Entity: Major League Baseball (Organization) 624169553
Copyright of Psychological Science (0956-7976) is the property of Sage Publications Inc. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
ISSN: 09567976
DOI: 10.1177/09567976241227411
Database: Business Source Complete