Academic Journal

Trial-Level and Contiguous Syntactic Adaptation: A Common Domain-General Mechanism at Play?

Bibliographic Details
Title: Trial-Level and Contiguous Syntactic Adaptation: A Common Domain-General Mechanism at Play?
Authors: Kuz, Varvara, Cai, Fangzhou, Chen, Keyue, Chen, Jiaxin, Qi, Xuzi, Veall, Clement, Zheng, Yuanqi, Xu, Zhengping, Santi, Andrea
Source: Languages; Mar2024, Vol. 9 Issue 3, p73, 39p
Abstract: Garden-path sentences generate processing difficulty due to a more preferred parse conflicting with incoming parsing information. A domain-general cognitive control mechanism has been argued to help identify and resolve these parsing conflicts. This cognitive control mechanism has been argued to underlie adaptation to garden path processing at the trial level (conflict adaptation) and contiguously over the experiment (syntactic adaptation) in independent literature. The strongest evidence for its domain generality comes from garden-path processing being facilitated when preceded by a non-syntactic conflict (e.g., Stroop). This has been reliably observed in the visual world paradigm, which, like Stroop, requires irrelevant visual information to be suppressed. We tested the domain generality of conflict adaptation and its relationship to contiguous syntactic adaptation across four experiments (n = 562). To eliminate the visual object confound, the Stroop task was followed by a sentence-reading task. We observed Stroop and ambiguity effects, but no conflict adaptation in each experiment. Contiguous syntactic adaptation was replicated and most compatible with the parser changing its expectations and/or improving revision. While the data largely fail to support a domain-general cognitive control mechanism, a language-specific one could operate in both trial and contiguous syntactic adaptation and is worth future exploration. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Subject Terms: CONTROL (Psychology), COGNITIVE ability, STROOP effect
Copyright of Languages is the property of MDPI and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
ISSN: 2226471X
DOI: 10.3390/languages9030073
Database: Complementary Index