Academic Journal

State, Identity, and Representations of Danger: Competing World Views on Indian Nuclearisation.

Bibliographic Details
Title: State, Identity, and Representations of Danger: Competing World Views on Indian Nuclearisation.
Authors: Das, Runa
Source: Commonwealth & Comparative Politics; Mar2008, Vol. 46 Issue 1, p2-28, 27p
Abstract: What explains India's nuclear detonation in May 1998? Some offer a realist, others a nuclear-apartheid, and some an identity-logic explanation for this detonation. My contention in this article is that the nuclear policy choice made by India in 1998, under the BJP government, is a culturally situated one and the logic of (in)securities that the state has used to justify this decision draws upon the ideological lenses of its then policy makers. To this extent, I compare how ideological perceptions of the post-colonial Indian state's leaders (evidenced under the Congress Party and the BJP) have articulated divergent notions of nationalisms, nationalist identities, and (in)securities perceived by the Indian state--thereby suggesting a link between political leaders' ideologies, articulation of statist identities, (in)securities, and nuclearisation policies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Subject Terms: NUCLEAR nonproliferation, NATIONAL security, NATIONALISM, POLITICAL science, POLITICS & government of India, 1977-, MILITARY policy
Geographic Terms: INDIA
Copyright of Commonwealth & Comparative Politics is the property of Routledge and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
ISSN: 14662043
DOI: 10.1080/14662040701837953
Database: Complementary Index