Norms versus Rationality: Why Democracies Use Private Military Companies in Civil Wars.

Bibliographic Details
Title: Norms versus Rationality: Why Democracies Use Private Military Companies in Civil Wars.
Authors: Binder, Martin
Source: Private Military & Security Companies; 2007, p307-320, 14p
Abstract: Private security and military services – so-called Private Military Companies (PMC) – were widely ignored as important actors in international politics. However, PMCs are of increasing interest both in light of the debate about new wars and, especially, in light of recent media reports on the role of such companies in the current war in Iraq (see Singer 2003a; Kümmel 2005). While a variety of actors, such as governments, transnational corporations, UN agencies, and NGOs hire PMCs to provide security in situations where states lack the capacity or willingness to do so, this article explores why democratic governments introduce private military companies as a foreign policy tool in civil conflicts. Drawing on constructivist and rationalist arguments, this article maintains that the contradictory effect of liberal norms and cost-benefit calculations can lead to the use of PMCs. When Western democracies are faced with internal wars in other countries, liberal norms foster support for intervention in humanitarian crises, while cost-benefit calculations often make these states reluctant to intervene in regions of little geo-strategic importance. This dilemma can lead to the use of PMCs in responding to the humanitarian impulse ˵to do something,″ while also reducing the financial, military and political risk of intervening. This argument is illustrated by considering the introduction of the American private security firm MPRI in Bosnia and the British company Sandline International in Sierra Leone. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Private Military & Security Companies is the property of Springer Nature / Books and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-531-90313-2_19
Database: Complementary Index