Book
Argumentation Frameworks as Neural Networks.
| Title: | Argumentation Frameworks as Neural Networks. |
|---|---|
| Authors: | d΄Avila Garcez, Artur S., Lamb, Luís C., Gabbay, Dov M. |
| Source: | Neural-symbolic Cognitive Reasoning; 2009, p143-159, 17p |
| Abstract: | Formal models of argumentation have been studied in several areas, notably in logic, philosophy, decision making, artificial intelligence, and law [25, 31, 39, 48, 83, 111, 153, 210, 212, 267]. In artificial intelligence, models of argumentation have been one of the approaches used in the representation of commonsense, nonmonotonic reasoning. They have been particularly successful in modelling chains of defeasible arguments so as to reach a conclusion [194, 209]. Although symbolic logic-based models have been the standard for the representation of argumentative reasoning [31, 108], such models are intrinsically related to artificial neural networks, as we shall show in this chapter. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Copyright of Neural-symbolic Cognitive Reasoning is the property of Springer Nature / Books and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) | |
| DOI: | 10.1007/978-3-540-73246-4_11 |
| Database: | Complementary Index |
Availability