Book
Surveying carnivores at large spatial scales: a comparison of four broad-applied methods.
| Title: | Surveying carnivores at large spatial scales: a comparison of four broad-applied methods. |
|---|---|
| Authors: | Hawksworth, David L., Bull, Alan T., Barea-Azcón, José Miguel, Virgós, Emilio, Ballesteros-Duperón, Elena, Moleón, Marcos, Chirosa, Manuel |
| Source: | Vertebrate Conservation & Biodiversity; 2007, p387-404, 18p |
| Abstract: | Reliable methods to estimate species richness are very important to managers and conservationists because they provide key data to make the right decisions in conservation programmes. In the case of carnivore mammals, traditional methods, such as direct count censuses, are not useful since these animals are usually scarce, elusive and nocturnal. Difficulties in carnivore sampling are compounded when monitoring programmes are developed at large spatial scales, where high economic costs and field efforts are necessary to achieve reliable richness or abundance estimates. These problems have highlighted the need to find more effective carnivore survey methods, especially in regions with high rates of landscape change, such as the Mediterranean basin. The present study, performed in a typical Mediterranean area, was the first in Europe to test simultaneously the relative efficiencies of four broad-applied sampling methods to detect carnivore species at large spatial scales. Sign surveys based on scat detection, scent stations, camera-trapping and live-trapping were investigated. We compared efficiencies using biological parameters and by considering both the logistic and economic costs of each method. Overall, scent stations and sign surveys were the most efficient methods both in economic and logistic terms. In addition, the use of scent stations may be necessary to detect species rarely detected by scats. Detailed and extensive training programmes for conducting sign surveys and scent stations may overcome perceived problems thus enhancing the widespread use of both methods. Our results are applicable not only to other Mediterranean areas, but also to other habitats and regions of the world. More research into the suitability of these and other methods in relation to different landscapes, seasons and species is required. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Copyright of Vertebrate Conservation & Biodiversity is the property of Springer eBooks and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) | |
| DOI: | 10.1007/978-1-4020-6320-6_26 |
| Database: | Supplemental Index |
Availability