Academic Journal

Post-Spinal Backache! A Myth or an Overlooked Complication

Bibliographic Details
Title: Post-Spinal Backache! A Myth or an Overlooked Complication
Authors: Aftab Hussain, Muhammad Asif Saleem, Rehana Feroze, Faisal Wahid, Saleem Pervaiz Bajwa, Muhammad Akram
Source: Pakistan Armed Forces Medical Journal, Vol 73, Iss 3 (2023)
Subject Terms: Backache, Back pain, General anesthesia, Post-spinal backache, Spinal anesthesia, Medicine, Medicine (General), R5-920
Publisher Information: Army Medical College Rawalpindi, 2023.
Publication Year: 2023
Collection: LCC:Medicine
LCC:Medicine (General)
Description: Objective: To find out the difference in the backache when a 27G Quincke needle with no more than two attempts is used for spinal anaesthesia versus general anaesthesia. Study Design: Prospective comparative study. Place and Duration of Study: Anesthesia Department, Combined Military Hospital, Lahore Pakistan, from Jun 2020 to May 2021. Methodology: A total of 150 patients were divided into two Groups. C-sections were performed under general and spinal anaesthesia in Group-GA and Group-SA, respectively. General anaesthesia was induced with intravenous anaesthetics following rapid sequence induction. The 27G Quincke needle was used for spinal anaesthesia with no more than two attempts. Post-operative follow-ups for backache were carried out at 24-hours, 1, 4 and 12 weeks. Results: At 24-hours post-operative follow-up, 8 patients from the GA-Group and 17 from the SA-Group had backache; the difference was significant (p-value of 0.049). At week-1, two patients from the GA-Group and five from the SA-Group complained of backache (p-value 0.246). Similarly, at week-4, only one patient from the GA Group and four from the SAGroup had backache (p-value 0.127). At the 12-week follow-up, only one patient complained of backache, and she belonged to the SA- Group (p-value 0.316). Conclusion: Spinal anesthesia results in a significantly high frequency of backache as compared to general anaesthesia in the immediate post-operative period; however, there is no long-term difference in backache.
Document Type: article
File Description: electronic resource
Language: English
ISSN: 0030-9648
2411-8842
Relation: https://www.pafmj.org/index.php/PAFMJ/article/view/7144; https://doaj.org/toc/0030-9648; https://doaj.org/toc/2411-8842
DOI: 10.51253/pafmj.v73i3.7144
Access URL: https://doaj.org/article/a0f65cde7b9e49d498a1a8e2ba9601fa
Accession Number: edsdoj.0f65cde7b9e49d498a1a8e2ba9601fa
ISSN: 0030964824118842
DOI: 10.51253/pafmj.v73i3.7144
Database: Directory of Open Access Journals