Academic Journal
Analyzing the composition of the editorial boards in high-impact medical ethics journals: a survey study
| Title: | Analyzing the composition of the editorial boards in high-impact medical ethics journals: a survey study |
|---|---|
| Authors: | Zhiwei Jia, Donghua Liu, Xingxuan Li, Tianlin Wen, Xiyan Zhao, Wei Li |
| Source: | BMC Medical Ethics, Vol 25, Iss 1, Pp 1-8 (2024) |
| Subject Terms: | Editorial board members, Medical ethics, Editor, Medical philosophy. Medical ethics, R723-726 |
| Publisher Information: | BMC, 2024. |
| Publication Year: | 2024 |
| Collection: | LCC:Medical philosophy. Medical ethics |
| Description: | Abstract Background The underrepresentation of scholarly works from low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) in academic literature is a documented concern, attributed partly to editorial biases. This trend, prevalent across various disciplines, has been less explored in the context of medical ethics journals. This study aimed to examine the composition of editorial board members (EBM) in high-impact medical ethics journals and to evaluate the extent of international diversity within these editorial teams. Methods This study incorporated an analysis of 16 high-impact medical ethics journals. Information regarding the EBM of these journals was systematically gathered and categorized based on the World Bank’s country income classifications. An in-depth examination of the editorial board compositions was then conducted. Results The study identified 669 EBM across the selected journals. A predominant 89.84% (601) of these members were from high-income countries (HICs), with upper-middle-income countries contributing 7.47% (50) and lower-middle-income countries 2.69% (18). No EBM were associated with low-income countries. A regional breakdown indicated that North America was the most represented area, accounting for 48.88% (327), followed by Europe & Central Asia (27.50%, 184), East Asia & Pacific (13.45%, 90), Latin America & Caribbean (4.63%, 31), Sub-Saharan Africa (4.19%, 28), Middle East & North Africa (0.75%, 5), and South Asia (0.60%, 4). In total, these EBMs hailed from 46 different countries, with the United States representing the largest proportion (43.80%, 293), followed by the United Kingdom (13.15%, 88), Australia (7.92%, 53), Germany (6.73%, 45), and Canada (5.08%, 34). Conclusions There is a significant lack of international representation within the EBM of high-impact medical ethics journals. The majority of editors in this field are affiliated with HICs, leading to a severe underrepresentation of LMICs within the editorial boards. |
| Document Type: | article |
| File Description: | electronic resource |
| Language: | English |
| ISSN: | 1472-6939 |
| Relation: | https://doaj.org/toc/1472-6939 |
| DOI: | 10.1186/s12910-024-01006-2 |
| Access URL: | https://doaj.org/article/2a15445b7f7c49f3be7a1a540bc46d34 |
| Accession Number: | edsdoj.2a15445b7f7c49f3be7a1a540bc46d34 |
| ISSN: | 14726939 |
| DOI: | 10.1186/s12910-024-01006-2 |
| Database: | Directory of Open Access Journals |