Academic Journal

Satisfaction with Control of Mild to Moderate Atopic Dermatitis with Ruxolitinib Cream: US Physician and Patient Perspectives

Bibliographic Details
Title: Satisfaction with Control of Mild to Moderate Atopic Dermatitis with Ruxolitinib Cream: US Physician and Patient Perspectives
Authors: Lawrence F. Eichenfield, Jinan Liu, Simran Marwaha, James Piercy, Daniel Sturm, Peter Anderson
Source: Dermatology and Therapy, Vol 14, Iss 3, Pp 685-696 (2024)
Subject Terms: Atopic dermatitis, Patient-reported outcomes, Real-world data, Treatment patterns, Dermatology, RL1-803
Publisher Information: Adis, Springer Healthcare, 2024.
Publication Year: 2024
Collection: LCC:Dermatology
Description: Abstract Introduction The 2021 US approval of ruxolitinib cream for treatment of atopic dermatitis (AD) in patients aged ≥ 12 years was based on the results of two pivotal phase 3 studies. Currently, real-world data to describe effectiveness of ruxolitinib cream and physician satisfaction with treatment remain limited. Our objective is to describe disease control among adults with mild to moderate AD prescribed ruxolitinib cream and physician satisfaction with treatment. Methods Data were from the Adelphi AD Disease Specific Programme™, a US real-world, cross-sectional survey of physician-reported data, undertaken between August 2022 and March 2023. For patients aged ≥ 18 years, physicians reported patient demographics, clinical characteristics, treatment patterns, and physician satisfaction with disease control. Descriptive analysis of data for patients with mild to moderate AD prior to the initiation of ruxolitinib cream and treated with ruxolitinib cream for ≥ 1 month was undertaken. Results Among physician-reported data from 1360 patients with AD, 149 patients had received ruxolitinib cream (in combination or as monotherapy) for ≥ 1 month, including 59 patients receiving monotherapy. Prior to treatment with ruxolitinib cream, 84.6% of patients had moderate AD (Investigator’s Global Assessment, IGA of 3), whereas after treatment (median duration, 26 weeks), only 21.5% had an IGA of 3, with 48.3% of patients having clear or almost clear skin (IGA of 0/1). For these patients, 81.2% were not currently experiencing a flare, and physicians were satisfied with disease control for 87.3%. Results were similar in patients receiving monotherapy. The most frequent physician-reported reasons for prescribing ruxolitinib cream included relieving itch, improving lesion redness/thickness, achieving disease control, and reducing/controlling flares. Conclusions These real-world findings demonstrate effective disease control and physician satisfaction with ruxolitinib cream for the treatment of AD in adults in a clinical practice setting. Outcomes were similar whether ruxolitinib cream was prescribed as monotherapy or in combination regimens, suggesting a role for ruxolitinib cream across the spectrum of disease.
Document Type: article
File Description: electronic resource
Language: English
ISSN: 2193-8210
2190-9172
Relation: https://doaj.org/toc/2193-8210; https://doaj.org/toc/2190-9172
DOI: 10.1007/s13555-024-01116-0
Access URL: https://doaj.org/article/a8680787b93e4187bc916de68e329c5d
Accession Number: edsdoj.8680787b93e4187bc916de68e329c5d
ISSN: 2193821021909172
DOI: 10.1007/s13555-024-01116-0
Database: Directory of Open Access Journals