Using satisfaction arguments and rich traceability in requirements prioritisation : a dissertation submitted to Auckland University of Technology in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Computer and Information Sciences (MCIS), 2009 / Praveen Kumar Motupally ; supervisor: Andy Connor.

Requirement Engineering (RE) is a distinct subset activity of Systems Engineering. Eliciting and Specifying requirements are the sub processes of RE. Eliciting and Specifying correct requirements, that meet the customer's needs contributes to the project's Quality and Success. However, det...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Motupally, Praveen Kumar (Author)
Corporate Author: AUT University. School of Computing and Mathematical Sciences
Format: Ethesis
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:Click here to access this resource online
Description
Summary:Requirement Engineering (RE) is a distinct subset activity of Systems Engineering. Eliciting and Specifying requirements are the sub processes of RE. Eliciting and Specifying correct requirements, that meet the customer's needs contributes to the project's Quality and Success. However, determining the "Candidate Requirements" is challenging for a number of reasons. Requirement Prioritisation helps to cope with this problem. A number of Requirement Prioritisation methods exist. This dissertation aims to investigate a better prioritisation technique by subjectively assessing the "effort" between prioritising requirements with the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) and prioritising "Satisfaction Arguments" (SA) with AHP and subjectively assessing the "effort" again. The results of the experiment show a similar set of priorities produced by both attempts, however, the perceived effort of prioritising SAs is less compared with prioritising requirements with AHP due to "Propagation of Priorities". The results of the experiment show that "Propagation of Priorities" is possible with both the approaches, however "Propagation of Priorities" was found to be bidirectional when prioritising SA with AHP and unidirectional when prioritising requirements with AHP.
Author supplied keywords: Requirement engineering; Satisfaction arguments; Analytical hierarchy process; Constructive research; Propagation of priorities; Requirement prioritisation.
Physical Description:1 online resource
Also held in print (61 leaves : illustrations ; 30 cm) (T 005.12 MOT) in off-campus storage, box 109
Bibliography:Includes bibliographical references.
Requests
Request this item Request this AUT item so you can pick it up when you're at the library.
Interlibrary Loan With Interlibrary Loan you can request the item from another library. It's a free service.